Saturday, January 29, 2011

Firefly, Chaotic Good, and Chaotic Neutral

Andrea and I have been watching Firefly over the last couple of days. While it's my billionth time through the series, it's her first, and we're both (still in my case) asking the question why the show got cancelled. This post isn't about that, but rather it's about Mal. Malcolm Reynolds (a.k.a Nathan Fillion) is often touted on the web as being a truer Han Solo than even Harrison Ford could must in the holy trilogy. A lot of this stems from memes about how Mal would shoot first (he would) unlike the weak ret-conning of Han waiting for Greedo to shoot first. So what?

I agree that Mal is a badass, but then again, if that's where it ended, he would be about as memorable as a 90's comic book anti-hero, which is to say not at all. Mal, at his core, is an indefatigable do-gooder. The man can't be helped, even though his crew is almost always down on their luck and the ship is constantly in need of repair, he goes out of his way to be a force for decency and "what's right" in the 'verse. Sure he'd like to get paid, but he's not holding payment over the heads of the people he helps.

Let's compare him to Jayne Cobb (a.k.a. the insanely right-wing Adam Baldwin). Jayne's the shows pure mercenary character who's out for money and big guns. He always asks how they're getting paid and is only ever interested in what his stake or percentage is going to be. He also loves the ladies. Jayne's loyalty is sketchy at best, and when asked why he's bringing grenades to a peaceful exchange of illegal goods, he asks why not. Jayne carries more guns than bullets so he's ready for any situation that could come up.

These two characters sound familiar? You GM enough games (usually just one is enough), and you'll see that Mal and Jayne can pretty much describe every player character out there. They are, in essence, representatives of Chaotic Good and Chaotic Neutral alignments. CCG players have terms for different kinds of players. I know Magic has their own, but I'm most familiar with Game of Thrones. In Game of Thrones, you had, for example, Shagga's or players who loved weird new toys they could mess around with without being terribly concerned whether they win or lose. I'm tempted to start referring to player characters as Mal's or Jayne's.

Looking at my Dragon Age game, I've got a Mal, two Jayne's, and a Mal/Jayne hybrid. Keegan (who invented this modern wonder of tabletop gaming), is playing a fighter seeking to become a Templar. He constantly seeks out ways he can help others, and was very excited last night when he earned the title "Mythal-Bane" as a sign for his commitment to seek peace and avert conflict before it can rise to the level of blood feud. He's committed to protecting the weak and helping the helpless (which shares a lot with another Joss Whedon creation now that I think about it). Chuck and Mike are playing my Jayne's, although they're both exemplifying different aspects. Chuck's mage is seeking ultimate power and any mystical items he finds along the way are only their to serve him in this pursuit. Mike's dwarven rogue is out to get rich and eventually open his own merchandise shops all over Fereldun. Keith is playing the hybrid archetype. His mage seeks power through a better understanding of the Fade while working closely with Keegan's fighter to try to do some good along the way.

Now this isn't to say that Chuck and Mike's characters don't want to do good and offer some help along the way, but if we're talking moral compass here, that they ain't. Now this was their first adventure (which we just completed last night quite successful - write-up is coming soon), so it'll be interesting to see how this dynamic plays out. Given popular fiction, the prediction is that Keegan's character will naturally rise to the role of leader. After all, most Mal's in stories are de facto leader given that they can drive the story in a satisfying direction. They're also less malleable when it comes to what they can allow happen in from of them. It's not like their paladins that will not allow the group to torture a prisoner - a little torture can do a  world of good in the world of fiction - but they can't exactly ignore a burning building full of orphans.

I'm sure there will be exceptions to this two archetypes, after all, Keiths' mage is a bit more nuanced when it comes to his motivations, but I think it's safe to say that in my experience (including my own characters), the Mal and Jayne archetypes are just more fun to play in general. Fun equals ubiquity. Hence, you see these types all over tarnation.



  1. Very wise breakdown of the two personas. Kudos

  2. Isn't Stephen Baldwin the insanely right-wing Baldwin?

  3. @Greg Thanks for the compliment! I'm not a big fan of formal alignments (I think it gives the characters too much lee-way to just play to a moral auto-code than actually make decisions for themselves), but I think they're useful for discussing characters beneath their surface.

    @Risus Unfortunately, you're also right. However, Adam's not related to those Baldwins. You can check out Adam Baldwin's often insane twitter account:!/adamsbaldwin

    I unfortunately don't believe he's being ironic when he retweets Sarah Palin and tweets things like:

    "Abolish the U.S. Department of Education! | RT @IBDeditorials "Federal Money Hasn't Bought Better Schools..." -"

    "Government School Sex Education Was Designed by Statists With the Specific Intent of Subverting Families. ~ Abolish It!"

    "By refusing to allow a vote on ObamaCare repeal in the Senate, Harry Reid acts as a tyrant & coward. ~ #RepressiveCivility"

    Dude wasn't playing a role in Firefly, he was playing himself.

  4. *Sigh* I guess I didn't really want to know that about Mr. Baldwin. :(


Noble Knight Games

Wanna support The Hopeless Gamer? Shop at Noble Knight Games via the banner below!


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...